Definitions & Conceptual Issues

Last Updated: January 21, 2009

What is a constitution?

Glossary of Related Definitions on Constitutions

Constitution
Noun: “A supreme law of the land promulgated to exercise sovereignty.”

Constitutional
Adjective: “Power or action in compliance with the provision of the constitution; related to the constitution.”

Constitutionalism
Noun: “A practice or philosophy of adherence to constitutional principles involving limits on the power of the government put by those constitutional principles and words of the constitution.”

Source: Cottrell, Jill. A Glossary of Constitutional Terms. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA), 2007, 22-88.
According to the United Nations Development Programme, “The constitution refers to fundamental principles of government of a nation implied in laws, customs or contained in a document or collection of documents (which may be referred to collectively as a ‘constitution,’ as ‘basic laws’ or ‘organic laws’). A constitution delineates the basic organization and operations of government, describing both its powers and limitations. Essentially, a constitution outlines the rules of the political game.”1

[Back to Top]

Terminology on constitutional processes

Constitutions refer to a set of principles enacting a basic legal structure, upon which the sovereignty of the state rests. However, the tangible and concrete document of a constitution must be distinguished from the notions of constitution building and ideas of constitution making (also called constitutional engineering) that largely connote a process by which this document is formed, deliberated upon, instituted, and amended. In modern discourses, deliberation and participation are seen as instrumental not only to the constitution-building process but also to constitution making.

 

Constitution building, constitution making, and constitutional engineering

Whereas constitution making, or constitutional engineering, refers to the technical act of rendering a constitution, constitution building largely connotes a broader, and lengthier, process,2 now generally considered instrumental in peacebuilding. Indeed, according to Kirsti Samuels, “Constitution Making can be considered a sub-component of Constitution building that focuses on actually making the constitution, and begins with the decision to create, review, or renew a constitution.”3 Constitution building has progressively been transformed from an elite-driven moment into a much more participatory progression that, in ideal circumstances, takes deliberative action. This can be significantly tied to the notion that state sovereignty is no longer merely thought of as top-down legitimate coercion, but also as bottom-up popular sovereignty. Go to Constitutions and peacebuilding processes

Hence, constitution building implies the process by which this document is formed, deliberated upon, instituted, and amended.4 It includes social transformation processes, as it engages in civic education and consensus-building projects.5 The process defines a rights-and-responsibility relationship in order to establish a social contract between citizen and state.6 Notions Used in Constitutional Processes

Constitutional Building
It “refers to the process whereby a political entity commits itself to the establishment and observance of a system of values and government. It is necessary to make a distinction between the written text that is the constitution and the practices that grow out of and sustain the constitution. Constitution-building stretches over time and involves state as well as non-state organizations. Constitution-building in this sense is almost an evolutionary process of nurturing the text and facilitating the unfolding of its logic and dynamics.”

Source: Ghai, Yash and Guido Galli, Constitution Building Processes and Democratization, Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 2006, 9.

Constitution making (constitutional engineering)

It refers to the technical process of drawing up or amending a constitution.

Source: Sakuntala Kadirgamar-Rajasingham, email correspondence, June 3, 2008.

Participatory constitution making
Participation and deliberation is conceived as an inherent feature in the technical process of drawing up a constitution, which “has become one criterion of a legitimate process. Where the premise of constitutionalism as conversation is taken on board, constitution making can no longer be confined exclusively to the domain of ‘high politics’ and negotiations among elites who draft texts behind closed doors.”

Source: Hart, Vivien, Democratic Constitution Making, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, July 2003, 5.


Deliberative and participatory constitution making

Recently, many scholars have emphasized the importance of a deliberative constitution-making (or constitutional engineering) process, that is, the idea of participation as inherent to the technical process of drawing up a constitution. In this thinking, the constitution as a framework should no longer be fashioned solely by elites. It is rather recommended that the constitution be subject to public oversight in its original crafting, and ultimately in adaptations made pending circumstantial changes. Some even argue that “participatory constitution making has become one criterion of a legitimate process. Constitution making can no longer be confined exclusively to the domain of ‘high politics’ and negotiations among elites who draft texts behind closed doors.”7 Thus, in this view, inclusion of citizenry in the formulation of the constitution itself is seen as important.

 This participatory criterion is both important and quite difficult to apply in post-conflict settings. Indeed, different options exist for the drafting of a constitution in such contexts:
  • As part of a peace agreement (in some cases, this may be the result of an international imposition);
  • Through a parliamentary or ad hoc commission (this is generally limited to cases where only constitutional reforms are made, with no real change of government, or may be used in the context of interim mechanisms); and
  • Through a constitutional assembly, after a first series of post-war general elections.
Each of these possibilities has its own limits and difficulties. All three generally tend to be a contrast to very elitist processes organized behind closed doors among a much-limited group of actors and a handful of experts. Theoretically, it is still possible to infuse some participatory dimension at different stages of such a process, but it is rare, which may have consequences for the type of state and democracy being built. It is also always possible to envision the approbation of a constitution by referendum but, in consideration of the high volatility of post-war contexts, this is rarely done.


1. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), The Constitution and Its Relationship to the Legislature (New York: United Nations).
2. Sakuntala Kadirgamar-Rajasingham, email correspondence, June 3, 2008.
3. Kirsti Samuels, “A Guidance Note: Developing a Constitution Building Strategy to Create Sustainable, Legitimate Constitutions,” Kirsti Samuels Consulting (2008), 1.
4. Yash Ghai and Guido Galli, Constitution Building Processes and Democratization (Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 2006), 9.
5. Sakuntala Kadirgamar-Rajasingham, email correspondence, June 3, 2008.
6. Louise Olivier, Constitutional Review and Reform and the Adherence to Democratic Principles in Constitutions in Southern African Countries (Johannesburg: Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa, 2007), 6.
7. Vivien Hart, Democratic Constitution Making (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, July 2003), 5.

The news, reports, and analyses herein are selected due to there relevance to issues of peacebuilding, or their significance to policymakers and practitioners. The content prepared by HPCR International is meant to summarize main points of the current debates and does not necessarily reflect the views of HPCR International or the Program of Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research. In addition, HPCR International and contributing partners are not responsible for the content of external publications and internet sites linked to this portal.